Guides
6 min read· August 27, 2026

P-multipliers and shadowing in lateral pile groups

Why lateral pile groups use row-specific p-multipliers (FHWA GEC 9 Table 7-1), not a single axial η — leading vs trailing rows, 3B/5B values, and what PileCalc applies.


Lateral group action does not reduce to a single η. Leading row pushes into fresh soil; trailing rows push into soil already disturbed — shadowing. Scale the p-values of each row's p-y curves by a row-specific p-multiplier less than 1. Deflections stay compatible (the cap forces a common head deflection); trailing rows attract less shear. Theory and the published table live on the pile group efficiency hub. Not a PE stamp, not a design example for a real project.

Why lateral groups are not one efficiency factor

Vertical Converse-Labarre is a different check — geometric screening on axial capacity. Clay equivalent-block is a third check. Do not mix them with lateral row interaction. When a group is pushed sideways, the leading row still sees relatively fresh soil, but each trailing row works against soil already displaced by the row ahead. A single axial η cannot capture that directional shadowing.

The standard treatment keeps compatible head deflections under the cap and reduces soil resistance row by row. Trailing piles then carry less head shear at the same deflection.

FHWA GEC 9 (2018) Table 7-1

PileCalc uses the row-specific multipliers of FHWA GEC 9 (2018), Table 7-1, tabulated at 3B and 5B loading-direction spacing, linearly interpolated between them. Copy these hub numbers; do not invent others:

Loading-direction spacing s/BRow 1Row 2Row 3 and higher
30.80.40.3
51.00.850.7

A 3×3 group at s/B = 3 runs its leading row at 0.8 and its trailing rows at 0.4 and 0.3 — trailing rows deliver less than half the leading row's resistance at the same deflection. PileCalc applies the table over its published 3B–5B range and reports pile resistance only, conservatively leaving any cap/soil contribution out.

What this is not

Vertical Converse-Labarre on the hub's 3×3 at s/d = 3 gives η ≈ 0.73 — layout-only axial screening. That is a different check. Clay equivalent-block failure is a third check. See Converse-Labarre equation and block failure in clay. Do not substitute a single axial η for row p-multipliers under lateral load.

Keep reading

Source: FHWA GEC 9, Design and Analysis of Laterally Loaded Deep Foundations (Table 7-1 row p-multipliers). Engineering judgment stays with the user.

Keep reading

Guides
August 26, 2026

Block failure in clay: the check Converse-Labarre misses

Why an efficiency formula alone can overestimate a tight friction-pile group in clay — the hub equivalent-block check (Q_block), soil-on-soil perimeter shear, and min(n·Q_single, Q_block).

Read
Guides
August 26, 2026

Lab: pile group efficiency (Converse-Labarre)

Course lab / practice drill: compute Converse-Labarre η by hand for the hub 3×3 s/d=3 case, confirm ~0.73 in the live calculator, and note what η does not cover.

Read
Guides
August 25, 2026

Converse-Labarre equation for pile group efficiency

A worked reduction-factor version of the formula that already ranks on the pile group efficiency hub. Geometric screening only. In clay, run the block check too.

Read

See it for yourself

Run Converse-Labarre group efficiency and the clay block check in your browser — free, no login.