Guides
6 min read· August 26, 2026

Lab: pile group efficiency (Converse-Labarre)

Course lab / practice drill: compute Converse-Labarre η by hand for the hub 3×3 s/d=3 case, confirm ~0.73 in the live calculator, and note what η does not cover.


A course-lab / practice drill for Converse-Labarre pile group efficiency. Geometric screening only — not a PE stamp, not a design example for a real project. Work the hub's 3×3 case by hand, then confirm it in the live pile group efficiency calculator. Theory and the published η table live on the pile group efficiency hub; the formula walk-through is on Converse-Labarre equation.

Given (hub worked example)

Copy these inputs. Do not invent a different η — the hub already published this case.

  • Rows m = 3, columns n = 3 (3×3 group)
  • Pile diameter d = 0.6 m
  • Centre-to-centre spacing s = 1.8 m (s/d = 3)

Hub result at s/d = 3 for a 3×3 group: η ≈ 0.73 (nine piles worth about 6.5 piles' capacity).

Step 1 — Compute η by hand

Same Converse-Labarre form as the hub and calculator:

η = 1 − θ · [(n₁ − 1)·n₂ + (n₂ − 1)·n₁] / (90 · n₁ · n₂)

θ = arctan(d / s) in degrees

With n₁ = n₂ = 3, d = 0.6 m, s = 1.8 m:

  • θ = arctan(d/s) = arctan(0.6/1.8) = 18.4°
  • bracket = (3 − 1)·3 + (3 − 1)·3 = 12
  • denominator = 90 · 3 · 3 = 810
  • η = 1 − 18.4 · 12/810 ≈ 0.73

Check: 0.73 · 9 ≈ 6.5 — nine piles worth about 6.5 piles' capacity. That matches the hub table cell for s/d = 3, 3×3 group.

Step 2 — Confirm in the live calculator

  1. Open the pile group efficiency calculator.
  2. Enter Rows m = 3, Columns n = 3, Spacing s = 1.8 (m), Pile diameter d = 0.6 (m).
  3. Confirm the reported η is about 0.73 — the same geometric screening result as Step 1 and the hub.

Step 3 — What this η is not

Converse-Labarre is layout-only. It does not cover:

  • Clay equivalent-block failure — check separately; it can govern below ~3d. An efficiency factor alone can overestimate a tight friction-pile group in clay.
  • Lateral group action — that is p-multipliers / shadowing (FHWA GEC 9), not a single axial η.

PileCalc's released vertical-group tool is the driven-sand path (η = 1) with the block printed as a diagnostic. Details and caveats are on the hub.

Optional stretch — other spacings from the hub table

Keep d = 0.6 m. Change s so s/d = 2 (s = 1.2 m) and s/d = 6 (s = 3.6 m). Run the calculator (and/or the formula) for 2×2, 3×3, and 4×4, then compare to the hub table — quote those cells; do not invent new ones:

  • s/d = 2: η = 0.70 (2×2), 0.61 (3×3), 0.56 (4×4)
  • s/d = 6: η = 0.90 (2×2), 0.86 (3×3), 0.84 (4×4)

Full table and commentary: pile group efficiency, explained.

References

Geometric screening only. Engineering judgment stays with the user — this lab is not a PE stamp and is not a design example for a real project.

Keep reading

Guides
August 27, 2026

P-multipliers and shadowing in lateral pile groups

Why lateral pile groups use row-specific p-multipliers (FHWA GEC 9 Table 7-1), not a single axial η — leading vs trailing rows, 3B/5B values, and what PileCalc applies.

Read
Guides
August 26, 2026

Block failure in clay: the check Converse-Labarre misses

Why an efficiency formula alone can overestimate a tight friction-pile group in clay — the hub equivalent-block check (Q_block), soil-on-soil perimeter shear, and min(n·Q_single, Q_block).

Read
Guides
August 25, 2026

Converse-Labarre equation for pile group efficiency

A worked reduction-factor version of the formula that already ranks on the pile group efficiency hub. Geometric screening only. In clay, run the block check too.

Read

See it for yourself

Run Converse-Labarre group efficiency and the clay block check in your browser — free, no login.