Lab: pile group efficiency (Converse-Labarre)
Course lab / practice drill: compute Converse-Labarre η by hand for the hub 3×3 s/d=3 case, confirm ~0.73 in the live calculator, and note what η does not cover.
A course-lab / practice drill for Converse-Labarre pile group efficiency. Geometric screening only — not a PE stamp, not a design example for a real project. Work the hub's 3×3 case by hand, then confirm it in the live pile group efficiency calculator. Theory and the published η table live on the pile group efficiency hub; the formula walk-through is on Converse-Labarre equation.
Given (hub worked example)
Copy these inputs. Do not invent a different η — the hub already published this case.
- Rows m = 3, columns n = 3 (3×3 group)
- Pile diameter d = 0.6 m
- Centre-to-centre spacing s = 1.8 m (s/d = 3)
Hub result at s/d = 3 for a 3×3 group: η ≈ 0.73 (nine piles worth about 6.5 piles' capacity).
Step 1 — Compute η by hand
Same Converse-Labarre form as the hub and calculator:
η = 1 − θ · [(n₁ − 1)·n₂ + (n₂ − 1)·n₁] / (90 · n₁ · n₂)
θ = arctan(d / s) in degreesWith n₁ = n₂ = 3, d = 0.6 m, s = 1.8 m:
- θ = arctan(d/s) = arctan(0.6/1.8) = 18.4°
- bracket = (3 − 1)·3 + (3 − 1)·3 = 12
- denominator = 90 · 3 · 3 = 810
- η = 1 − 18.4 · 12/810 ≈ 0.73
Check: 0.73 · 9 ≈ 6.5 — nine piles worth about 6.5 piles' capacity. That matches the hub table cell for s/d = 3, 3×3 group.
Step 2 — Confirm in the live calculator
- Open the pile group efficiency calculator.
- Enter Rows m = 3, Columns n = 3, Spacing s = 1.8 (m), Pile diameter d = 0.6 (m).
- Confirm the reported η is about 0.73 — the same geometric screening result as Step 1 and the hub.
Step 3 — What this η is not
Converse-Labarre is layout-only. It does not cover:
- Clay equivalent-block failure — check separately; it can govern below ~3d. An efficiency factor alone can overestimate a tight friction-pile group in clay.
- Lateral group action — that is p-multipliers / shadowing (FHWA GEC 9), not a single axial η.
PileCalc's released vertical-group tool is the driven-sand path (η = 1) with the block printed as a diagnostic. Details and caveats are on the hub.
Optional stretch — other spacings from the hub table
Keep d = 0.6 m. Change s so s/d = 2 (s = 1.2 m) and s/d = 6 (s = 3.6 m). Run the calculator (and/or the formula) for 2×2, 3×3, and 4×4, then compare to the hub table — quote those cells; do not invent new ones:
- s/d = 2: η = 0.70 (2×2), 0.61 (3×3), 0.56 (4×4)
- s/d = 6: η = 0.90 (2×2), 0.86 (3×3), 0.84 (4×4)
Full table and commentary: pile group efficiency, explained.
References
- Live calculator (rows, columns, spacing, diameter)
- Pile group efficiency hub
- Converse-Labarre equation
Geometric screening only. Engineering judgment stays with the user — this lab is not a PE stamp and is not a design example for a real project.
Keep reading
P-multipliers and shadowing in lateral pile groups
Why lateral pile groups use row-specific p-multipliers (FHWA GEC 9 Table 7-1), not a single axial η — leading vs trailing rows, 3B/5B values, and what PileCalc applies.
ReadBlock failure in clay: the check Converse-Labarre misses
Why an efficiency formula alone can overestimate a tight friction-pile group in clay — the hub equivalent-block check (Q_block), soil-on-soil perimeter shear, and min(n·Q_single, Q_block).
ReadConverse-Labarre equation for pile group efficiency
A worked reduction-factor version of the formula that already ranks on the pile group efficiency hub. Geometric screening only. In clay, run the block check too.
ReadSee it for yourself
Run Converse-Labarre group efficiency and the clay block check in your browser — free, no login.