FHWA drilled-shaft design — axial and lateral, one browser tab.
The same FHWA-IF-99-025 methods SHAFT implements — α and β side resistance, rock sockets, belled bases — plus the lateral p-y run SHAFT can't do, in your browser. Free to try, $39.99/month for Pro.
SHAFT and PileCalc implement the same FHWA drilled-shaft methods. The difference is the workflow and the cadence: SHAFT is a Windows/USB-key license last versioned in 2023, sized axially only — the lateral run needs LPILE. PileCalc does the axial and lateral design of the same shaft in one browser session.
- Platform
- Windows desktop (USB key / network license)
- Pricing
- ≈ $950 perpetual + $143/yr maintenance
- Scope
- Axial capacity & settlement of drilled shafts
What Ensoft SHAFT does well
- Faithful implementation of the FHWA drilled-shaft canon (O'Neill & Reese, GEC-10)
- Rock, IGM, gravel and decomposed-rock side resistance plus belled (underreamed) shafts
- Multi-diameter comparison runs for rapid sizing studies
Where PileCalc is different
- The same FHWA-IF-99-025 α / β / rock-socket methods, in your browser
- Lateral response of the same shaft in the same tool — SHAFT needs a separate LPILE license
- Belled-base uplift, exclusion zones and every intermediate value visible
- Free tier and $39.99/month, on any OS
The numbers, published
PileCalc's engine is checked term-by-term against the reference codes. A representative sample of the benchmarks — every intermediate value is visible in the app so you can reproduce them yourself.
PileCalc vs SHAFT: common questions
Run the comparison yourself
Open the same pile in PileCalc and see the result in your browser in under a minute.
Launch the app